from the FOCUS blogger Jeff Runyan:
...when I think of Our Lady, I don’t think of her as Our Lady of
“Guadalupe.” I think of her as Our Lady of “Coatlexopeuh.” That’s right.
Our Lady of Co-ahh-tla-shu-peh. After all, in 1531 when Mary appeared
to Saint Juan Diego on the hill of Tepeyac she didn’t speak to him in
Spanish. She conversed with this Aztec peasant in his native language of
Nahuatl. Many paleolinguistic scholars (those who study ancient
languages) are pretty certain that Mary didn’t introduce herself as
“Guadalupe,” (which relates to a place in Spain) but instead,
“Coatlexopeh,” the meaning of which gives this story a whole new -and
exceptionally awesome- twist.
So how did we get from “Coatlexopeuh” to Guadalupe? Let’s go back a
few years to 1517 when the Spaniards first arrived along the glorious
coast of Mexico’s Yucatán Peninsula. Encountering the native Mayan
peoples the conquistadors inquired of them the name of the land. As
culturally sensitive as the conquistadors were, I am sure they spoke
loudly and slowly to the Mayans when they asked in Spanish, “¿Cómo se
llama está tierra?” (“What is this land called?”). I’m also pretty sure
that they asked the question several times, each time progressively
louder and slower. Anyway, as history would tell us, the Mayans, in a
fit of confusion, looked at each other exhorting, “Uk Athan,” “Uk
Athan,” meaning in this Mayan dialect, “What are they saying?”, “What
are they saying?” The Spaniards then naturally concluded that their
communicative skills had delivered and declared that this land must be
called “Yucatán” (get it – Uk Athan = Yucatán?). Keep this story in the
back of your mind because it relates directly to naming of Our Lady of
“Guadalupe.”
So let’s fast-forward a few years to 1531 and another geographic
location in Mexico: Mexico City, the capital of the Aztec empire. This
date falls right in the midst of the Spanish conquest, which was working
to eradicate Aztec religious practices, which included the sacrifice of
tens of thousands of innocent human beings to Aztec “gods.” The notably
warring Aztec civilization kidnapped thousands of people from small
villages in the countryside around the capital and held them as slaves
until they were ready to march them mechanically to the top of their
temple pyramids, cut out their beating hearts, and throw their bodies
down the pyramid stairs. This was all in an effort to appease their
“gods.” How significant was this atrocity against humanity? One
historical source reports 80,000 people being slaughtered in this manner
in a period of only four days. Several historical accounts attest to an
appalling massacre where a ceaseless line of innocent humans were cued
up to be murdered one after another 24 hours a day. If you get a chance
to visit Mexico City, right in the heart of downtown you can visit the
remains the main pyramid where these sacrifices took place. It’s not
just stuff of legends, it’s real. You can see where they piled up skulls
of their victims. You can see rock-hewn statues with holes in their
chest that represent and commemorate the sacrifices. But when you visit
this complex you will note one very eerie theme represented in all of
the hieroglyphs and artwork on the temple: carved rock serpents. They
are found throughout the entire temple complex. It doesn’t take much to
recognize that this place and the deeds carried out here were blatantly
evil. Dare we say that any episode of genocide is absolutely evil? Does
anyone else have “red flags” fly when there are symbols of snakes
covering a place where genocide has taken place? After all, isn’t the
serpent a universal sign of evil?
So let’s go back to the story of Juan Diego. On December 9th
of 1531, this recently converted Aztec peasant found himself traversing
the hill of Tepeyac to the north of Mexico City. In the midst of the
journey, a woman clothed in red with a blue mantle and “clothed with the
sun” appeared to him and asked that he speak to the bishop to get a
church built where they stood on the hill. Obviously this is a pretty
tremendous occurrence, so Juan Diego went straight to the Bishop. The
bishop, Juan de Zumárraga was slightly skeptical (as any good bishop
would be), but he did not discount that God could be at work. He
requested more evidence of Juan Diego’s encounter on Tepeyac. A slightly
distressed Juan returned to the hill only to find the woman again who
instructed him to pluck the roses that were miraculously blooming around
him and show them to the bishop as a sign of his encounter. Consider
this, it was the dead of the Mexican winter (OK, not so cold, but also
no flowers would be blooming) and the roses were Castilian roses (a
variety from Spain). Juan filled his tilma (the cactus fiber
garment he was wearing) with the roses, went to visit bishop, dropped
the roses in front of him and, without Juan knowing, an image of this
woman has been imprinted on his garment. Again, like any good bishop,
there was immediate recognition of a miracle, and the bishop (probably
fully knowing that this was the Virgin Mary), asked Juan, “What did this
lady call herself?” … And now the crux of the issue. Juan said she
called herself “Coatlexopeuh.” The bishop, not speaking Nahuatl (and
probably pretty excited) said, “did you say … did you say… Guadalupe?”
and probably the humble Juan said, “no… Coatlexopeuh.” So (as we have
seen the precedent set with the naming of the Yucatán), the bishop
declared that this is Our Lady of “Guadalupe” (which is a place in Spain
and has its own revered image of the Virgin Mary). After all
“Coatlexopeuh” when pronounced does sound a lot like “Guadalupe.”
What was the significance of this episode? Until 1531 the
overwhelming majority of Aztec Indians had resisted conversion to
Christianity and continued with their sacrificial practices. However, as
the message of Our Lady spread, an estimated 10,000,000 indigenous
people converted to the faith and human sacrifices were eradicated. So…
you are waiting for it… what does “Coatlexopeuh” mean in Nahuatl?: “I WHO CRUSH, STAMP OUT, OR DESTROY THE SERPENT.”
5/22/2012
Our Lady of Coatlexopeuh
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment