The doctrine of the Perpetual Virginity of
the Blessed Virgin Mary is “not so much concerned with specific
physiological proprieties in the natural process of birth..., but with
the healing and saving influence of the grace of the Savior on human
nature.”
This one is even easier. If we presume that Archbishop Müller means
to deny the physiological miracles associated with the Virgin Birth, of
course, the quotation sets off loud alarms. But why assume what the
quotation does not say? In fact, it admits the physiological miracles
easily enough. All it says is that the doctrine of Mary’s perpetual
virginity is “not so much concerned” with the physiological miracles as
with what it teaches us about the “healing and saving influence of the
grace of the Savior”.
The phrase “not so much concerned” may simply mean that the doctrine
has a higher purpose than what meets the eye, exactly as most of
Christ’s miracles did. I would love to see this in the original context
of dogmatic theology, to see how this notion of the “healing and saving
influence of the grace of the Savior on human nature” is explicated and
applied as a principle of theological interpretation (hermeneutic).
Advanced theology is hard work. Let’s not jump to unwarranted
conclusions about the orthodoxy of a close friend and trusted colleague
of Pope Benedict XVI, an archbishop who is overseeing the publication of
the sixteen volumes of the Pope’s writings, a theologian who has spent
his last ten years working in the Congregation for the Doctrine of the
Faith, and the Congregation’s new Prefect, whose views may have matured
and refined themselves significantly during that time.
- a worthy admonition from Catholic Culture
Let's spend some time meditating on the impact of Mary's virginity on the salvation of our souls.
7/10/2012
What concerns us
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment